On 18/01/2017 16:26, John Cowan wrote:
it is not only the *changes* but the *entire* derivative work of which you are the copyright owner.
Ok. The original copyright owner of A gave me the rights to use A, so I used A for producing B (also a mere "copy"), and then I'm the copyright owner of B because I'm the author of B. Then automatically by law (Berne Convention) I have all the rights on B, and I can decide to license B under my terms of choice.
I can use A in B, only if I respect the license of A. So in case of BSD and ISC only if I cite the original authors, and the original license. So very minimal requirements.
Put in these term it seems very simple.
Of course you cannot prevent the making of other derivative works under license from the original author.
Ok obvious. A remains A. I owns only B. Regards, Massimo _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
