From: Andrew J Bromage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> As a matter of interest, was my question (i.e. "here are my constraints,
> what licence would suit my purpose") on topic on license-discuss?
Nobody would have objected to that message. The problem is arguments between
various key players regarding their free software policies, where those
policies are legitimate topics of argument, but not of interest (or
embarassing to us) when read by various people who are here to have their
licenses reviewed.
Thanks
Bruce
- How about [email protected]? johnston
- Re: How about [email protected]? Richard Auld
- Re: How about [email protected]? phred
- Re: How about [email protected]? Derek J. Balling
- Re: How about [email protected]? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.... Derek J. Balling
- Re: How about [email protected]? bruce
- Re: How about [email protected]? Justin Wells
- Re: How about [email protected]? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: How about [email protected]? Ali Assam
- Re: How about [email protected]? bruce
- Re: How about [email protected]? Justin Wells
- Re: How about [email protected]? Richard Stallman
- Re: How about [email protected]? bruce
- Re: How about [email protected]? Signal 11

