G'day all. On Tue, Sep 21, 1999 at 03:24:42AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Nobody would have objected to that message. I didn't think so. My point is that had this mailing list been called "license-review", I probably wouldn't have posted it here, because it wasn't a licence which needed review. :-) All this discussion over the name and charter. Why does this remind me of a Usenet RFD? Cheers, Andrew Bromage
- How about [email protected]? johnston
- Re: How about [email protected]? Richard Auld
- Re: How about [email protected]? phred
- Re: How about [email protected]? Derek J. Balling
- Re: How about [email protected]? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: How about license-review@opensource.... Derek J. Balling
- Re: How about [email protected]? bruce
- Re: How about [email protected]? Justin Wells
- Re: How about [email protected]? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: How about [email protected]? Ali Assam
- Re: How about [email protected]? bruce
- Re: How about [email protected]? Justin Wells
- Re: How about [email protected]? Richard Stallman
- Re: How about [email protected]? bruce
- Re: How about [email protected]? Signal 11

