Ken Arromdee scripsit:
> If B is dual-licensed, that dual license got lost at the step where you
> distributed A+B. You must distribute A+B under GPL-only, which makes that
> particular copy of B GPL-only too. Any dual-licensed copies of B must be
> obtained separately.
I think so. But this is easily cured by distributing both A+B and B.
This is "mere aggregation" and not covered by the GPL.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Arandir
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? John Cowan
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ross N. Williams
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Arandir
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ross N. Williams
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Nick Moffitt
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? John Cowan
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? John Cowan
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ross N. Williams
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee

