On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, John Cowan wrote: > > If B is dual-licensed, that dual license got lost at the step where you > > distributed A+B. You must distribute A+B under GPL-only, which makes that > > particular copy of B GPL-only too. Any dual-licensed copies of B must be > > obtained separately. > I think so. But this is easily cured by distributing both A+B and B. Yes, it is. But doesn't it seem a bit strange?
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? John Cowan
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ross N. Williams
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Arandir
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ross N. Williams
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Nick Moffitt
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? John Cowan
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? John Cowan
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ross N. Williams
- Re: Does a GPL API infect its apps? Ken Arromdee

