On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Brian Behlendorf wrote: > On Sat, 13 Nov 1999, Mark Wells wrote: > > "Welcome to our FTP archive. Please note that by downloading software > > from this archive you are indicating that you have read and agreed to the > > terms of the Fanatical Public License. If you do not agree to this > > license, please disconnect now." > > Nope. If the terms of the license go beyond what copyright law provides > for (such as covering use), it has to be a clickwrap license, meaning an > explicit "I agree" stage, that can't easilly be automated around. I suppose you're right, but there are ways to make it harder to automate around. Again, the FTP sites for cryptographic software have to do this sort of thing.
- Copyright vs. GPL vs. API Angelo Schneider
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Justin Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Justin Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Dj
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Mark Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Mark Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Jules Bean
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Jules Bean
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? David Starner
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Jules Bean
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? David Starner
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Justin Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir

