G"day all. On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 08:37:49PM +0000, Dj wrote: > The problem you face is simple. The viral nature of the GPL means that to > run a GPL java program means always binding with non-GPL code such as > the class libraries. With the possible exceptions of using certain kinds of distributed operating system or distributing core files, nobody ever distributes running Java programs, so the GPL doesn't say anything about what should happen in the situation. Cheers, Andrew Bromage
- Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Justin Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Mark Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Copyright vs. GPL vs. API Angelo Schneider
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Justin Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Justin Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Dj
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Andrew J Bromage
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Ken Arromdee
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Mark Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Mark Wells
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Jules Bean
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Jules Bean
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? David Starner
- Re: Can Java code EVER be GPLd, at all? Arandir

