On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 10:37:29PM -0400, Justin Wells wrote: > I think you step on to very dangerous ground when you call > non-opensource development a "field of endeavour". Dangerous ground > which might give way under the GPL, and prevent other things which we > would like to allow. I agree with the concept, but I'd phrase it differently: in the context of Debian's Free Software Guidelines or the Open Source definition, viewing "non-opensource development" as a "field of endeavour" is flat-out contradictory. Basically, it's a meaningless distinction: like calling lying a shade of truth. -- Raul
- "Open Source" Motif J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Peter Makholm
- Re: "Open Source" Motif John Cowan
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Johnson
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Justin Wells
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Martin Schulze
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Justin Wells
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Gregory Martin Pfeil
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Johnson
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Johnson
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Joseph Carter
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Martin Konold
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Dj
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Martin Konold
- Re: "Open Source" Motif John Cowan
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller

