On Tue, 16 May 2000, Raul Miller wrote: > the possibility of dual-licensing Motif, with GPL and the original Motif > license being choosable by the licensee. The issue here is: would this > generate enough revenue to be worth bothering with? Due to the fact that the GPL is according to RMS incompatible to anything except itself dual licensing with GPL leads unfortunately to the fragmentation of development. Regards, -- martin
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Justin Wells
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Gregory Martin Pfeil
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Johnson
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Johnson
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Joseph Carter
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Martin Konold
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Dj
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Martin Konold
- Re: "Open Source" Motif John Cowan
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Raul Miller
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Starner
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Justin Wells
- Re: "Open Source" Motif John Cowan
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Johnson
- Re: "Open Source" Motif John Cowan
- Re: "Open Source" Motif David Johnson
- Re: "Open Source" Motif Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: "Open Source" Motif John Cowan

