Eric Jacobs wrote: >> without exercising control over the quality of his derivative works > "OSI Certified" is a certification mark, a kind of trademark. Yet open > source software authors can claim their software to be "OSI Certified", > not just "equivalent to OSI Certified". This doesn't constitute > abandonment of the trademark -- does it? Not at all. Note the phrase with >> marker above. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Lawrence E. Rosen
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Eric Jacobs
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? phil hunt
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Lawrence E. Rosen
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Eric Jacobs
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? John Cowan
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Lawrence E. Rosen
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Frank LaMonica
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? John Cowan
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave Gilbert
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? John Cowan
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Chloe Hoffman
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf