Chloe Hoffman wrote: > In the U.S. at least, building a house from a blueprint is creating a > copy of an architectural work Oops, put my foot in it. No dog biscuit! > - see the definition of an "architectural > work" in s. 101 of the U.S. Copyright Act and other limitations in s. > 120. Well, at least it's a hack specific to architectural works.
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Eric Jacobs
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... John Cowan
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the O... Lawrence E. Rosen
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... Frank LaMonica
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... John Cowan
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave Gilbert
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? John Cowan
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Chloe Hoffman
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... Dave Gilbert
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... Karsten M. Self
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- RE: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Dave J Woolley
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Brian Behlendorf
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the OSD? Tom Hull
- Re: namespace protection compatible with the O... Brian Behlendorf