re: documentation

[email]

"Matthew C. Weigel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Greg London wrote:
>
>       > 1) software IS documentation.
>
>       The stance that puts software under copyright as opposed to patent law
>       opines that a software is a document, but that's entirely different.

according to webster, et al, "opine" means to give an opinion. Opine ==> opinion

Which got me wondering.  Exactly what world do you live in that software
is NOT considered a document, controlled by copyright law?
Where I'm from it's a legal fact, and there is no opinion in the matter.

Greg