>There is always an opinion - "should software methods be patentable," >or "does the DMCA appropriately represent the well-accepted >cost/benefit analysis of copyright?" In Europe at least, software under patent is legal fact, not opinion. Software processes are not patentable except as a part of an overall non-software process - each case seperately considered. So the world where software is covered by patent law is, basically, the USA. Which is not a world. SamBC
- Re: documentation David Johnson
- Re: documentation David Johnson
- re: documentation email
- Re: documentation John Cowan
- re: documentation email
- re: documentation Matthew C. Weigel
- re: documentation Matthew C. Weigel
- Re: documentation Steve Mallett
- RE: documentation sambc
- RE: documentation Matthew C. Weigel
- RE: re: documentation nights
- RE: re: documentation Matthew C. Weigel
- RE: Re: documentation sambc
- Re: Re: documentation Steve Mallett
- re: documentation email
- re: documentation email
- Re: documentation Rob Myers
- RE: re: documentation nights
- re: documentation email
- RE: re: documentation sambc
- RE: documentation sambc

