I don't pretend to fully understand your 'movement'. I konw the principle
behind copytleft: it is a means to an end. But as I understand it, within
your belief that everyone is free to copy software, there are restrictions on
further use and a flat fee is payable. Am I misguided. You do not accept the
principle of an absolutely free public domain.
I was not trying to insult you but was merely trying to provide some balance.
Often in a frenzy against something, one's analysis can be self-serving
rather than balanced. I was just shocked to see how one-sided the discussion
seemed to be and thought an alternative may have been appreciated.
- copyright discussion JEETUN6
- Re: copyright discussion M. Drew Streib
- RE: copyright discussion Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: copyright discussion David Johnson
- RE: copyright discussion Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
- Re: copyright discussion David Johnson
- Re: copyright discussion JEETUN6
- Re: copyright discussion JEETUN6
- Re: copyright discussion David Johnson
- Re: copyright discussion Randy Kramer
- Re: copyright discussion Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: copyright discussion sambc
- Re: copyright discussion sambc
- Re: copyright discussion lilun95
- Re: copyright discussion Greg London

