Martin Konold writes: > According to RMS the only way to become free software aka "GPL compatible" > is either to have it GPL licensed or allow for conversion/relicensing to > GPL.
I believe this is an accurate statement. Since the GPL requires that GPL'ed software have no extra restrictions placed on it, and a combined work must comply with all preceding licenses, then any combination of GPL+[other license] must have the same terms as the GPL. So it may as well *be* the GPL for all practical purposes. -- -russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://russnelson.com Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | It's a crime, not an act 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | of war. For my take, see: Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | http://quaker.org/crime.html -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
