On Monday 01 October 2001 17:00, Matthew C. Weigel wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Russell Nelson wrote: > > If you don't value freedom for its effects (admittedly a pragmatic > > argument), why do you value it? > > On ethical grounds- it is not an effect, an incidence, of freedom, that > I value.
To play Devil's Advocate: if there are no effects to freedom, wouldn't you be just as happy with a certificate saying "I'm free" as actually being free? -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
