[EMAIL PROTECTED] scripsit: > the original situation was with regard to > linking GPL software. when you redistribute > GPL software linked with other software, > the other software must be GPL licensed as > well.
No, it has to be freely distributable, not GPL. A compiled Linux kernel is GPL, and so are most of its parts, but some are under the BSD, which is fine because that is a free distribution license that imposes no extra restrictions above the GPL. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact, at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door. --sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
