the key here is the qualifying 'before obtaining written permission'. should you NEVER obtain written permission you never need endorse anything. if this is not clear from the wording then i am happy to ammend the clause for clarity.
cheers dave At 12:29 PM -0500 5/3/02, Forrest J Cavalier III wrote: >dave sag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, in part > >> Clause 4 does NOT require promition of derivatives at all. Should you >> never obtain written permission, you never need endorse anything. >> > >4. The names "Pronoic", or "pronoic.org" must be used to endorse and > promote products derived from this software before obtaining > written permission. > >You argue that the clause means "must be used WHEN endorsing and >promoting". My interpretation, on the other hand, is that as written >it compels you to endorse and promote products. > >What interpretation do others make? > > > >-- >license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3 -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
