last summer we wrote some highly pronoic code now just needs licence VOTE yes to APOSSL
cheers dave At 9:25 AM -0800 6/3/02, Rick Moen wrote: >Quoting dave sag ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> * the software should be described as being pronoic unless you ask >> for permission to use the term pronoic. in that case your request >> will be denied. > >This is just... so Zen. A modest proposal as to form follows: > >The software should be >Described as pronoic if >No permission sought. > >If approval asked >To use this noun in your code, >Sorry, no licence. > >(Apologies for the lack of nature/season image, "kigo". One tries.) > >-- >license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3 -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
