On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 12:43 p, dave sag wrote: > I get the idea that you feel that there should be as few OSSLs as > possible and are acting more as a review board than an > accreditation board.
We are neither. We are a discussion board. The discussion tends towards, "another!?!?" > Surely a licence conforms to the OSD or it does not. Whether > there is matter in the licence that is outside of the scope of the > OSD would seem to me to be irrelevant to the veracity of the > licence. This just makes a stronger case that we are being jerked around. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3