Colin Percival scripsit: > I may be wrong here, but isn't this covered by trademark, not copyright, > law?
Only if "eNetWizard" is in fact a trademark, which may not be the case. Even if one is not "in trade", one may wish to avoid confusion between one's own software and someone else's. -- John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.reutershealth.com I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_ -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
