eNetWizard may not be a registered trademark, but it certainly seems as if it is being used as a common law trademark -- and that's good enough to get protection. /Larry Rosen
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Cowan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:47 AM > To: Colin Percival > Cc: Robert Samuel White; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard > Content Application > > > Colin Percival scripsit: > > > I may be wrong here, but isn't this covered by trademark, not > > copyright, > > law? > > Only if "eNetWizard" is in fact a trademark, which may not be > the case. Even if one is not "in trade", one may wish to > avoid confusion between one's own software and someone else's. > > -- > John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.reutershealth.com > I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan > han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith. --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_ > -- > license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3 > -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
