> It still doesn't help with the OSL's central defect, which is > that it deems almost every user to be a distributor, unless > running the program has zero effect on anyone but the user > (e.g. a self-contained game).
I think that overstates the case somewhat. Is that how broadly you read section 5? Perhaps, then, the wording should be cleaned up. Suggestions? /Larry -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
