> > > > From: Noah Levitt [mailto:nlevitt@;computer.crynwr.com] On > > > > In your opinion, would the act of distributing a piece of > > > > (say) GPL software or a derivative of it be sufficient to > > > > indicate assent, assuming that the distributor in question > > > > obtained the software by downloading a source tarball via > > > > ftp, without click-wrap, and that the tarball had a file > > > > called COPYING with the full text of the GPL? > > > > > > The GPL folks think it is sufficient. I don't agree, but I'm not a > > > judge nor am I your lawyer. :-) > > I do not believe I have the right to make unauthorized copies or > derivative works of GPL-licensed software. Just in case it's needed, > the previous sentence is a manifestation of my assent.
I'm having trouble reconciling these two statements then. Am I missing something? Greg -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
