> > > > The GPL folks think it is sufficient. I don't agree, > but I'm not > > > > a judge nor am I your lawyer. :-) > > > > I do not believe I have the right to make unauthorized copies or > > derivative works of GPL-licensed software. Just in case > it's needed, > > the previous sentence is a manifestation of my assent. > > I'm having trouble reconciling these two statements then. Am > I missing something?
As someone who knows about the GPL, I cannot claim that I don't know what I'm doing when I accept a piece of GPL-licensed software. I am willing to assent to the GPL terms and conditions. It doesn't matter to me what legal theory the GPL lawyers want to use to enforce their license. /Larry -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
