Lewis Collard wrote: > > > The Plan 9 license forbids personal modification > > > > I agree, but so does the OSL 1.0, which is Open Source (the > > OSL 1.1 does not have this problem). > > Then I disagree with the certification of the OSL v1.0 as Open Source.
Count me in. If I can't modify the software for which I have the source code, what point would it be in having it? Verifying that it contains bugs I'm not allowed to fix?! By giving someone access to the source code, you have also given them the option of rebuilding the software themselves. If soneone finds an error in named source, why on earth would any sane person want to stop that someone from fixing the bug for his/hers personal binary/binaries? /Mike -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3