I disagree. (I know, I do that a lot, but I mean well.) It's best if licenses are simply either approved or not approved. There is no list of licenses that have been rejected or withdrawn; that would be punitive. By the same token, there should be no special status given to licenses in limbo.
> Perhaps OSI would list licenses that have ended > in limbo (neither rejected nor approved) and/or > list licenses that claim to be "open source" but > which are not (yet) certified by the OSI. > > -- > ralph -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
