On Wednesday 12 March 2003 01:34 pm, Abe Kornelis wrote: > I'll stress my point one last time (you're bored stiff > already, I don't doubt) I would offer the recipients of my software > three choices: > 1) make no modifications. > 2) make mods and keep them private > 3) make mods and publish to the public, either by publishing > yourself or by passing a copy of the modifications to me.
That's was not what I understood the term "must-publish" to be. Certainly your definition is acceptable, non-onerous, and obviously Free. Many OSS and FS licenses already have these provisions. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org -- license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3