Karl Fogel scripsit: > Thank you very much, everyone, for the incredibly helpful feedback. > When this discussion list shines, it shines brightly indeed!
Note that X.net is in the main list, but is deprecated. I'd like to reiterate my proposal that the licensor-specific licenses be pushed into a separate list either down the page or off-page. Nobody else will be able to use them for their projects anyhow. Here is what I believe to be a conservative list of such licenses: PHP, Python, Apple Public Source, Sleepycat, Zope, W3C, Computer Associates, EU DataGrid, Entessa, Frameworx, LaTeX, Multics, Naumen, Nethack, Nokia, OCLC, CNRI, RealNetworks, Ricoh, Sybase, Vovida. Some of the licenses in the current non-reusable category seem to me to be in fact reusable (though not particularly desirable), so I have not mentioned them here. -- Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML John Cowan Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker co...@ccil.org saying "No information items inside". http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --Eve Maler _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
