Quoting Bruce Perens (br...@perens.com): > It's regarding your statement: > > it doesn't seem likely to cast light on other areas of copyright > law. In particular, it cases none on what suffices to create a new > work and what is a derivative work. > > The point is that there's not /anything else/ in that body of law > that would make the proposed work derivative.
No, indeed. I adressed the Google/Oracle case beause _you_ suddenly threw it into the conversation. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
