Quoting Luis Villa (l...@tieguy.org): > More specifically, CC does it with the requirement in the license that > attribution notices link to the canonical text. Many OSS software > licenses, unfortunately, require distribution of the actual text of > the license.
Not an objection, but just as a reminder: Licensor can waive that requirement. Years ago, I reminded readers on this mailing list that possibly useful reciprocal licences for non-software use by people disliking GFDL include GPLv2, and that FSF even published a piece explaining the advantages before they fell in love with GFDL: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/nonsoftware-copyleft.html I was told, here: You shouldn't do that. That's dumb, because then redistributors would need to include the full text of GPL. Um, hello? Waiver. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss