Happy to take suggestions on the "in essence" part- trying to capture the basics in one sentence.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Richard Fontana <rfont...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 04:01:03PM -0800, Luis Villa wrote: >> 2. REVISE /LICENSES/ : The "Open Source Licensing" page (replacing the >> current http://opensource.org/licenses/) would say (hopefully all >> changes self-explanatory): >> >> " >> Open source licenses are licenses that comply with the Open Source >> Definition[link] - in essence, they allow software to be used, >> modified, and redistributed without restriction. > > I don't agree with the "in essence" part. > >> * In the longer term, once Drupal is upgraded, it will likely make >> sense to generate http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical and >> http://opensource.org/licenses/category programatically, rather than >> through the current manual listing, which is of course error-prone. >> (Some people have suggested doing away with the alphabetical list >> altogether, which I personally would be fine with.) > > I've actually found the alphabetical list useful at times, FWIW. > > - Richard > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
