Count my vote as NO for the same reason that Nigel gave. Count me also as frustrated that OSI continues to silence the arguments against your license categorizations!
/Larry Lawrence Rosen Rosenlaw & Einschlag, a technology law firm (www.rosenlaw.com) 3001 King Ranch Rd., Ukiah, CA 95482 Office: 707-485-1242 -----Original Message----- From: John Cowan [mailto:co...@mercury.ccil.org] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 10:40 AM To: license-discuss@opensource.org Subject: Re: [License-discuss] proposal to revise and slightly reorganize the OSI licensing page [revisited] Tzeng, Nigel H. scripsit: > Frankly, if you aren't going to tackle the categorization issue then > I'd just update the links to insure they are accurate and leave it > alone because you're going to have contention over what belongs in > that list of "popular, widely used or have strong communities" on the > revised landing page. Okay, you're against the change; the rest is off-topic for this thread. -- BALIN FUNDINUL UZBAD KHAZADDUMU co...@ccil.org BALIN SON OF FUNDIN LORD OF KHAZAD-DUM http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss