Prashant Shah wrote:
Is there any license out there that puts it in a better way ?
You keep repeating the question without explaining what is wrong with the existing clauses.
In the case of GPL one is it mainly meeting the minimum requirements for establishing the copyright status of the file when used outside of the original application. Such re-use is fundamental to the GPL concept, even if many open source developers only think of their programs as ever being used as a whole.
-- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
