On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Gervase Markham <g...@mozilla.org> wrote: > On 01/02/13 07:28, Ben Reser wrote: >> No, the license doesn't matter. If you redistribute a modified file, >> regardless of how you chose to license your modifications you need to >> specify that you modified the file. > > Right. And, as you note, this doesn't apply to Apache as they actually > aren't using their own license as inbound. Except where they are, and > they ignore this requirement anyway. (Which says something about its > value and relevance.)
So, having a book-keeping clause is no guarantee that one will follow it as it is in case of Apache. Also not having a book-keeping clause doesn't mean that one cannot not follow it - one can if he wants to :) @Ben it will take me sometime to go though your response. Regards. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
