On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:28:54 -0800 (PST) Brian Behlendorf <br...@behlendorf.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Luis Villa wrote: > > The board meeting notes, in every case that I'm aware of, are > > pretty uninformative- they simply say approved/not approved. I'm > > open to persuasion on this point, I suppose, but I'm inclined to > > see it as noise/additional clutter. > > It's the validation that indeed the approval happened - sort of like > a commit message that just references an issue ID. Even if > minimalist, useful for traceability. I have found that the date of approval is sometimes of historical interest. - RF _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
