On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Richard Fontana <font...@sharpeleven.org>wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2013 09:28:54 -0800 (PST) > Brian Behlendorf <br...@behlendorf.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Luis Villa wrote: > > > The board meeting notes, in every case that I'm aware of, are > > > pretty uninformative- they simply say approved/not approved. I'm > > > open to persuasion on this point, I suppose, but I'm inclined to > > > see it as noise/additional clutter. > > > > It's the validation that indeed the approval happened - sort of like > > a commit message that just references an issue ID. Even if > > minimalist, useful for traceability. > > I have found that the date of approval is sometimes of historical > interest. Alright, alright. :) This is going to be hard to find in most cases, but I welcome help with that :) Luis
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
