Hello all, the Non-Profit Open Software License [1] has non-profit amendment which discriminates against for-profit, i.e. commercial use. It seems to me that this clear violates the Open Source Definition [2] because it discriminates against a specific field of endeavor. Can somebody please explain to me why OSI lists the license as open source [3]? Is there something I'm missing?
Thanks you, Vaclav [1] https://opensource.org/licenses/NPOSL-3.0 [2] https://opensource.org/definition [3] https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
