Quoting Simon Phipps (webm...@opensource.org): > There are certainly list members who are keen for us all to believe > that without too much question.
Fortunately, a comfortable amount of difference does exist between discussing of law in abstract terms -- even in great detail as to its application to _theoretical_ sets of facts -- and the giving of legal advice. I remember back in 1998, when scrappy Berkeley publishing house Nolo Press proved the foregoing a truth universally acknowledged, even in Texas. http://blog.nolo.com/blog/2011/04/11/the-brief-story-of-texas-vs-nolo/ -- Cheers, Homo in Domu Alba, qui est iratus et habet in Rick Moen artificialibus capillum: Quod homo non sit r...@linuxmafia.com honesta, et est perniciosa in rei publicae. McQ! (4x80) _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
