So what is the point of the OSI if it cannot do a simple up or down vote on a license submission from NASA after 3 years or provide any compatibility guidance on the licenses it managed to approve in the distant past?
Especially if the FSF has no problems in providing such guidance? From: David Woolley <for...@david-woolley.me.uk<mailto:for...@david-woolley.me.uk>> Date: Wednesday, Feb 15, 2017, 4:17 PM To: license-discuss@opensource.org <license-discuss@opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss@opensource.org>> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] OSI equivalent On 15/02/17 16:58, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) wrote: > Does OSI have a license compatibility chart for the various approved licenses? I would have thought that any such document would constitute legal advice, which is illegal for half the list members to provide, and the other half would only provide in the context of their specific client's circumstances. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
