On Monday 25 June 2007 05:25, Erik Johansson wrote: > But I have yet to see such code and gcc will print a warning when you > compile it, so I don't think it's a strong argument. On the other > hand, the documentation and readability gains you get by using NULL is > well worth it, even if it's a "hack".
Well, we can use NULL then. I'd prefer to use nullptr though, but I'm pretty sure most compilers don't support it. Unless it is in boost... > Anyway, I've updated the wiki with both your comments. If it looks ok > to you all, we can move on and start doing some coding :) Looks fine to me. So, where should we start coding? I have played around a bit with the erijo-dev branch and it seems to be a decent start. If we start to use that as a base, then I guess it would make sense to assign certain portions to people. I will see about finally finishing the document about owners, using the comments that I received awhile ago. Jon -- ________________________________________________________ Jon Keating ICQ: 16325723 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.licq.org GPG: 2290A71F http://www.thejon.org HOME: Minamiashigara, Japan
