gfdsa wrote: >On Saturday 06 July 2002 13:53, Stefan Seifert wrote: > > >>gfdsa wrote: >> >> >>>Hi. >>> >>>Does anyone can give me a clue? >>>It will be very appreciated >>> >>> >>> > > > >>I had the same problem. In the Bugtracker on Sourceforge.net I found the >>hint to start licq with >>KMALLOC=0 licq >>on the shell, this way it works just fine. >> >>Does anyone know something about that and a better solution? Otherwise >>it should at least be noted in some docs. >> >> >> >> >> > >didnt work for me, same segmentation fault >:-( >may be it should be compiled with KMALLOC=0 ??? >
Oh sorry, was my mistake. I should start to sleep from time to time... It should be KDE_MALLOC=0 licq not KMALLOC Hope this works better ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek We have stuff for geeks like you. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
