On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:48:27PM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote: > On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:38:19PM +0200, Ulrik Mikaelsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > >> I think just checking for vector would be sufficient. Can anyone > >> comment on that? > >> > >> By the way, it is good practice to quote nested macro calls with '[' > >> and ']'. Note that AC_MSG_ERROR should be quoted too. > > > > I think vector is not available in 2.96.x versions of gcc? > > vector = vector.h vector != vector.h In <vector> the whole vector-stuff is wrapped inside namespace std. The difference is: You'll have to say "using namespace std;" or just "using std::vector" or say "std::vector" each time you use it. Otherwise it will stay invisible. Or just stay with "vector.h". Same for all the rest of STL, except <string>. > The only difference is that the .h notation is deprecated and > gcc3.something enforces this. gcc3 can also handle vector.h just as well. But there were previous versions of gcc, which simply ignored namespace std and let u use without prerequisites.
Bj�rn ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
