Thomas Reitelbach wrote: > > Here is the patch, please take a look! > > i'm not sure if i get this correctly, but your patch does seem to check for > qt_version beeing > 3. > > it is kde's version to check for.
Yes, you are absolutely right but I think that it is impossible to link licq with KDE3 and QT2, so it's nothing criminal to check QT version instead of KDE's. > if we have kde2 -> link against libqt if we have kde2-> we have qt2->link against libqt > if we have kde3 -> link against libqt-mt if we have kde3->we have qt3->link against libqt-mt > did i misunderstood something? no, you are right, but if you think it's better to check KDE version I will do that. -- WBR, Roman Magic is real... unless declared integer. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel