Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> > Here is the patch, please take a look!
>
> i'm not sure if i get this correctly, but your patch does seem to check for
> qt_version beeing > 3.
>
> it is kde's version to check for.

Yes, you are absolutely right but I think that it is impossible to link licq 
with KDE3 and QT2, so it's nothing criminal to check QT version instead of 
KDE's.

> if we have kde2 -> link against libqt
if we have kde2-> we have qt2->link against libqt
> if we have kde3 -> link against libqt-mt
if we have kde3->we have qt3->link against libqt-mt

> did i misunderstood something?
no, you are right, but if you think it's better to check KDE version I will 
do that.

-- 
WBR, Roman

Magic is real... unless declared integer.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel

Reply via email to