On Friday 02 January 2004 00:02, <DeXteR> wrote: > Thomas Reitelbach wrote: > >On Thursday 01 January 2004 19:30, Juan F. Codagnone wrote: > >>I was surfing the internet, when i found this thread > >>http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=119178 > >> > >>The attached path tries to hide that problem. I don't have NPTL in my > >> box, so i could't try if it really works. > > > >I can't try it as well. > > I can try it (fedora saddle's me up with an nptl kernel). But how can i > test it?
Well, just get Licq 1.2.7 from the website and try to compile it on your NPTL enabled linux. It should produce an error at the link stage. But i'm not sure if you really can test this, since redhat did backport nptl to the 2.4 kernel and therefore this is not a clean test, i'm pretty sure they modified big parts of the code and maybe they re-implemented the pthread_kill_other_threads_np function into NPTL due to compatibility reasons. Anyway, if you receive the error proceed: Wait a day and fetch Licq from CVS (cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/licq co licq) and try to compile this one, it should include Juan's fix. If this one works for you, then the fix is ok :) Thomas -- email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: DreamForce on #licq UIN: 75450207 (urgent messages only)
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
