Hello Jon
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:26:17 +0900 Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On February 12, 2005 06:26 pm, wwp wrote: > > > IMO the smallest footprint patch would be to add a command-line switch > > > to DISable the dockicon feature. > > > > > > Let consider that the dockicon use is set in the user's licq config, the > > > user just has to call licq w/ this extra command-line argument when he > > > wants licq no to use the dockicon feature and ignore its dockicon > > > settings (optionally it can also grey out the dockicon settings). > > This is what I was thinking... > > If the dock is enabled and the user gives the switch, then we don't > use the dock. If the user doesn't give the switch, we just use what is > in the config file. Of course this means that the switch cannot change > the config file. That would make it work with minimal effort. OK so I'll give it a try. Regards, -- wwp ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
