Hi, On Friday 19 August 2005 21:03, wwp wrote: > Hello Thomas, > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:08:43 +0200 Thomas Heidemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jon, hi list. > > > > As Konstantin pointed out some days ago invisible status is still > > broken in current CVS-HEAD. I do use the version from August, 14th > > (self compiled). > > > > When I start licq into (online) status (aka invisible) I am indeed > > invisible for all contacts using ICQ2003Pro or ICQ5 (others not > > tested). But for users which use licq my status is presented as > > invisible. It is just like as they are on my visible list which is > > not the case (checked with ICQ5). > > In this example, my contact uses Licq-1.3.0. > > > > Any suggestions? > > I've been experiencing visibility issues too. Jon told me that > server-side list is mandatory to get correct (in)visibility. Did you > checked this option?
Yes. I do use the server side list since licq supports it. > Anyway the use of server-side list didn't fix things to me, I got > many mix/conflicts between my local contacts list and the server side > one (server reports errors), but Jon is currently performing tests > upon it. But that's another topic.. Sorry, currently I do not have the time do test this behavior in detail. But I'm sure Jon will get into it ;) Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Heidemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel