Hi,

On Friday 19 August 2005 21:03, wwp wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:08:43 +0200 Thomas Heidemann 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jon, hi list.
> >
> > As Konstantin pointed out some days ago invisible status is still
> > broken in current CVS-HEAD. I do use the version from August, 14th
> > (self compiled).
> >
> > When I start licq into (online) status (aka invisible) I am indeed
> > invisible for all contacts using ICQ2003Pro or ICQ5 (others not
> > tested). But for users which use licq my status is presented as
> > invisible. It is just like as they are on my visible list which is
> > not the case (checked with ICQ5).
> > In this example, my contact uses Licq-1.3.0.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
>
> I've been experiencing visibility issues too. Jon told me that
> server-side list is mandatory to get correct (in)visibility. Did you
> checked this option?

Yes. I do use the server side list since licq supports it.

> Anyway the use of server-side list didn't fix things to me, I got
> many mix/conflicts between my local contacts list and the server side
> one (server reports errors), but Jon is currently performing tests
> upon it. But that's another topic..

Sorry, currently I do not have the time do test this behavior in detail. 
But I'm sure Jon will get into it ;)

Regards,
Thomas

-- 
Thomas Heidemann
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel

Reply via email to