The CVS I downloaded a few days ago is really stable on my two Linux machines (Red Hat v7.1 and v7.2). At least it should be released as 1.05 Beta or something.
An update on the Web site frontpage is a good idea IMHO. -- "I like ants, in chocolate. Crunch, hummmm." --unknown -- /\___/\ Phillip Pi (Ant) / /\ /\ \ E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | |o o| | \ _ / The Ant Farm: http://antfarm.home.dhs.org ( ) ICQ UIN: 2223658 > > I trust the developers are aware that the latest release (1.0.4) isn't > much good these days. But on the other hand it is my impression that > there are quite a lot of changes going on with the insides of Licq, so > I think that's why they are holding a release back. > > This isn't optimal since a lot of new users are bound to think Licq > isn't a good piece of software when they try out the latest release, > which doesn't work. But is it better to release something that isn't > stable? Just the other night the CVS-version I'm using crashed several > times :-( > > An update about it on the frontpage of website would be just great, if > you ask me. Then new users could try out the development-version, but > then they would be aware that they should expect crashes at everything > else that comes with using bleeding edge. _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Licq-main mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
