#788: styles like gaim/kopete
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
  Reporter:  nobody       |       Owner:  emostar 
      Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  assigned
  Priority:  normal       |   Milestone:  1.3.5   
 Component:  qt/kde gui   |     Version:          
Resolution:  None         |    Keywords:          
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Changes (by erijo):

  * milestone:  => 1.3.5

Old description:

> The dialog style has some serious design flaws:
>
> 1. colors. unnecessary. Red on white? annoying.
> 2. wastes way too much space:
>
> 15:54:51 [----] joe:
> blablablablablabl
>
> 15:55:02 [----] None:
> abbiabbiabbimoo
>

> that's a waste of 4 lines.
>
> how about:
>
> 15:54:51 [----] joe: blablablablablabl
> 15:55:02 [----] None: abbiabbiabbimoo
>
> (besides, what does that [----] mean anyway?)
>
> 3.: "None" - why None? why not my nickname/alias?
>
> 4.: history: barely readable due to the same as in 1./2. but even worse
> since there's not talk about joe and jack, but only from and to.
>
> 15:54:51 [----] FROM joe: blablablablablabl
> 15:55:02 [----] TO joe : abbiabbiabbimoo
>
> doesn't make sense. why break with the scheme here all of a sudden?
>
> Apart from that I'd like to stick with licq, works better than any other
> icq client now.

New description:

 The dialog style has some serious design flaws:

 1. colors. unnecessary. Red on white? annoying.

 2. wastes way too much space:
 {{{
 15:54:51 [----] joe:
 blablablablablabl

 15:55:02 [----] None:
 abbiabbiabbimoo

 }}}

 that's a waste of 4 lines.

 how about:
 {{{
 15:54:51 [----] joe: blablablablablabl
 15:55:02 [----] None: abbiabbiabbimoo
 }}}
 (besides, what does that [----] mean anyway?)

 3. "None" - why None? why not my nickname/alias?

 4. history: barely readable due to the same as in 1./2. but even worse
 since there's not talk about joe and jack, but only from and to.
 {{{
 15:54:51 [----] FROM joe: blablablablablabl
 15:55:02 [----] TO joe : abbiabbiabbimoo
 }}}
 doesn't make sense. why break with the scheme here all of a sudden?

 Apart from that I'd like to stick with licq, works better than any other
 icq client now.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.licq.org/ticket/788#comment:1>
Licq <http://trac.licq.org/>
Licq - an instant messaging client for UNIX.

Reply via email to