> Do default handlers actually do anything?
Right now, no they don't, I need to noodle the design to make sure
there's nothing that it would be usefull to inherit
> Why not using functions or a List[(String) => Any] (Instead of String
> you may pass any type so the function signature is not so important).
> This is a paradigm used in Lift a lot.
I can't say I'm familiar with that syntax? (well, what it's actually
doing). Might you be able to explain a little?
I want to build it so that users can execute any code they wish upon a
different event from paypal.
Cheers
Tim
>
>
> Br's,
> Marius
>
> On Oct 16, 1:36 pm, Tim Perrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Im just implementing the IPN stuff for paypal and had a quick
>> question. I think it would be cool to write something like:
>>
>> PaypalIPNHandler(
>> ).onFailure(FailureHandler).onVerified(VerifiedHandler)
>>
>> object FailureHandler { ... } // or case class etc
>> object VerifiedHandler { ... }
>>
>> Im thinking of this so that then users can subclass the default
>> handlers and get all the functionality / processing that comes as
>> default, but then lets them customise so they can update the database
>> or whatever they want to do with that information.
>>
>> So, my question is this: is this a good idea? Any drawbacks in doing
>> this?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Tim
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
